- Home -

- Forum -

Alternative Energy
Book Reviews
Construction
Cookbook
Ecology
Flowers
Frugality
Fruit
Land
Lifestyle
Livestock
Machinery
My Neck of the Woods
Nostalgia
Outdoor Lore
Personals
Pets
Poultry
Politics
Self-Employment
Vegetables
World
Write for Homestead. org
Copyright © 2003-2008 Homestead.org

Check out your Biorhythyms


Find your local Farmer's Market


Stick a pin on our guest map


USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map


Make Homestead.org your home page


Database of State Incentives for Renewable Energy

 

 
 

Ticks!

continued from page 1

 

by Neil Shelton

 

MYTH No. 3: Ticks must be removed very carefully.


Luckily for my purposes of ridicule, the doc goes on to tell us that we should never, never, ever remove ticks with our fingers. Unfortunately, he doesn’t say why, but he does recommend using fine tweezers.


He goes on to say, "Don’t use alcohol, nail polish or petroleum jelly to remove ticks – it just makes them mad. A provoked tick will attach itself more firmly to it’s host..."


"A provoked tick" - I marvel at the mere suggestion, as ticks in my experience have seemed rather passionless. Perhaps this is where the term "ticked off" originates. The Doc recommends you go home and shower after your tick exposure. Again, he doesn’t exactly say why. Certainly you’re not going to just WASH OFF any self-respecting tick. They do this for a living, and they’re damned good at it. It makes sense though, that if you're not going to be removing your ticks (maybe you want to show them to your friends when you get home) you’ll want to make certain that they’re as clean as you are.


The article said the doctor was from New Jersey, but is suspect he is originally from A Large Western State.


The other day, I got into a tick discussion on a Usenet group. Some poor babe was trying to find out how to AVOID ticks, and all the local experts seemed fixated on how to advise her to properly remove them once she’d been "tick-timized".


My client seemed to favor trying to discourage the attached tick (she got dozens, of course) by burning them with a cigarette lighter. This appeared to be a very painful solution and a very ineffectual one. Maybe if you pulled the tick off with your fingers and THEN burned it.


Let’s get to the point here. How do you spend a great deal of time in the Great Outdoors without being driven to distraction by ticks?


STEP ONE: KNOW YOUR TICK MODUS OPERANDI.


Here’s how ticks do business. They climb up onto a tall stem of grass or a bush and wait until something warm and juicy, such as yourself, walks by and rubs against them. When it does, they hop on.


STEP TWO: AVOIDING TICKS


Therefore, the number one best and most effective thing you can do to avoid ticks is to avoid tall grass. At home this is best done by mowing the lawn. In the wild, it’s somewhat more difficult, but there are ways to lessen the impact of your tick-related experience.


Ticks do not immediately sink their choppers into your soft underbelly as might a Doberman Pinscher. In fact, you might find that they’ll even wander around in your clothes for a few hours before selecting just the right spot from your lush display of anatomy.


That’s just one good reason not to wear a lot of clothes.


When you must walk through tall grass or any area that promises tickfulness, try wearing shorts so you can easily see any ticks that get on you. Every so often, bend down and look to see if ticks are crawling up your legs. If they are, simply flick them off and go on your way.


Grizzled old-timers think that anyone who uses insect repellent probably has lace on his shorts too, but a good repellent such as "Off" applied directly to your bare legs in conjunction with this frequent-check-and-flick routine is about as effective as any method you’ll find. (Besides what’s wrong with lace?)


Nothing, however, is foolproof, so when you do get them, here’s the Noble Savage two-step technique for removing ticks:


1. Grasp the tick between the nails of your thumb and middle finger.


2. Pull.


I think part of the reason that so many people may be squeamish about this technique is because, in the process of sucking your very delicious blood, the tick actually embeds his head inside your skin and when you pull him out, chances are the head stays behind. This can cause more aggravated itching and, I imagine, increase one’s exposure to Lyme Disease.


I agree that you shouldn’t try unguents or fire to try to get the tick to let go. Ticks very are slow to pick up on a hint, and you’ll just look silly in the process. If you want to carry tweezers around with you, I guess that would work okay, but the most important thing is to get the tick as quickly as you can after he bites into you. The longer he’s been ensconced, the more you’ll itch when he’s gone. I’ve also read that if you screw the tick out counter-clockwise, you’ll remove him with his head intact. This sounds a little off-the-wall, but I’ve tried it, and it does seem as though they don’t itch quite as much when you do. Maybe.


You may note that I’ve not made a lot of comment about Lyme Disease. I have to admit that for several years I suspected that the whole ailment had been invented by Newsweek. I’m sure I’ve removed ten thousand ticks from my person in this lifetime, and in my experience the itch is the major down-side. In recent years, however, my father, a confirmed tough-guy from way back, claims to have contracted the disease and if that’s what he said he had, I’ll not argue. I’d just comment that the odds of NOT getting it are better than one is led to suppose.


In summary, ticks are a fact of life most everywhere there are mammals living outdoors. Places that have more ticks tend to have fewer muggers. You need to put things in perspective.

 

Previous   1   2    Home

  
 




Hit Counter